<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:14:57 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Mxrk</title><subtitle>Weblog</subtitle><id>http://mxrk.net/home/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://mxrk.net/home/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mxrk.net/home/atom.xml"/><updated>2010-03-07T20:45:04Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Look and Feel</title><category term="Emmexarkay"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/3/7/look-and-feel.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/3/7/look-and-feel.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-03-07T20:10:28Z</published><updated>2010-03-07T20:10:28Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be playing around with the old CSS file. I&#8217;m trying to create a more definite division between the blog and the comic, while styling the two journals more consistently. I realize these are two contradictory goals, but right now I think the two halves are a little confusing. Let&#8217;s see what happens.</p>
<p>Everything should work how it&#8217;s supposed to, but let me know if your reading exprerience isn&#8217;t as spiteful and venomous as you&#8217;ve come to expect.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>#60. Perspectives</title><category term="Red Phone"/><category term="Web Comics"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/3/1/60-perspectives.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/3/1/60-perspectives.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-03-02T04:33:28Z</published><updated>2010-03-02T04:33:28Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://mxrk.net/redphone/2010/3/1/60-perspectives.html"><img src="http://mxrk.net/storage/redphone060.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267891284293" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Van Jones on Glenn Beck</title><category term="Politics"/><category term="Video"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/3/1/van-jones-on-glenn-beck.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/3/1/van-jones-on-glenn-beck.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-03-01T19:26:17Z</published><updated>2010-03-01T19:26:17Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qpizoS3HREY&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qpizoS3HREY&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s one way to do it. He talks to Glenn Beck at about 1:30. (via C&amp;L)</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>#59. Resistance</title><category term="Red Phone"/><category term="Web Comics"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/26/59-resistance.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/26/59-resistance.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-02-27T01:45:04Z</published><updated>2010-02-27T01:45:04Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://mxrk.net/redphone/2010/2/26/59-resistance.html"><img src="http://mxrk.net/storage/redphone059.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267891358828" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Watch the Bipartisan Healthcare Summit Live</title><category term="Politics"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/25/watch-the-bipartisan-healthcare-summit-live.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/25/watch-the-bipartisan-healthcare-summit-live.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-02-25T14:57:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-25T14:57:00Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/bipartisanmeeting"><img src="http://mxrk.net/storage/summit2.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267110335663" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Well, despite some <a href="http://mxrk.net/redphone/2010/2/15/54-the-spider-and-the-fly.html">initial GOP trepidation</a>, it looks like Obama is finally going to get his summit. <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/bipartisanmeeting">Let&#8217;s watch</a>.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>#58. Stayin' Alive</title><category term="Red Phone"/><category term="Web Comics"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/23/58-stayin-alive.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/23/58-stayin-alive.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-02-24T04:56:55Z</published><updated>2010-02-24T04:56:55Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://mxrk.net/redphone/2010/2/23/58-stayin-alive.html"><img src="http://mxrk.net/storage/redphone058.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267891428898" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>#57. Mnemonic</title><category term="Red Phone"/><category term="Web Comics"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/22/57-mnemonic.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/22/57-mnemonic.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-02-22T06:16:28Z</published><updated>2010-02-22T06:16:28Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://mxrk.net/redphone/2010/2/22/57-mnemonic.html"><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://mxrk.net/storage/redphone057.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1266819438795" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p>Click for larger.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>#56. Relief Effort</title><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/18/56-relief-effort.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/18/56-relief-effort.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-02-19T02:00:50Z</published><updated>2010-02-19T02:00:50Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://mxrk.net/redphone/2010/2/18/56-relief-effort.html"><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://mxrk.net/storage/redphone056.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1266544930200" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p>Click for larger.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Speaking of AdWords...</title><category term="Emmexarkay"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/18/speaking-of-adwords.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/18/speaking-of-adwords.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-02-18T22:38:33Z</published><updated>2010-02-18T22:38:33Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Remember how I talked about <a href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/8/adios-ads.html">how much I disliked my Google Ads experience</a>? Well, I just got a dang coupon in my email for $100 in free advertising from Google, so I can spread the word about <a href="http://twitter.com/Mxrk/status/9248334832">people who sound like Paul Simon</a>. I know what you&#8217;re thinking: &#8220;Score!&#8221; But hold your horses, imaginary friend, let&#8217;s check out those terms and conditions.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Promotional credit must be applied to a new AdWords account within 15 days of creating the AdWords account and is valid only for new Google AdWords customers with self-managed sign-up accounts. <strong>Advertisers will be charged for advertising that exceeds the promotional credit. Advertisers will need to suspend their ads if they do not wish to receive additional charges beyond the free credit amount</strong>. Offer subject to ad approval, valid registration, and acceptance of the Google AdWords program standard terms and conditions. The promotional credit is non-transferable and may not be sold or bartered. Offer may be revoked at any time for any reason by Google Inc. One promotional credit per customer. <strong>Advertisers with self-managed sign-up accounts are subject to a $5 (C$10) activation fee. Advertisers who choose prepay billing are subject to a $10 (C$20) minimum prepayment fee before their account is activated. </strong>Any such prepay amount will be credited to Advertiser&rsquo;s account once account is activated.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To be perfectly honest, I assumed this was how it was going to work. This is how free shit <em>always</em> works. No one should be surprised or disappointed that the possibility exists for me to overspend my free money without realizing it. And of course &#8220;free&#8221; really means $10. But knowing myself, and knowing my enemy, this is how the conversation will inevitably go:</p>
<p><strong>Me:</strong> Hi, Google? Yeah, I wasn&#8217;t paying attention and I went beyond the free credit you gave me. Maybe we could just let it go this one time?</p>
<p><strong>Google:</strong> No, we&#8217;d like our money now.</p>
<p><strong>Me:</strong> Yeah, but you see, you still owe me $2.02 from when I let you put all those &#8220;NoBama&#8221; ads on my site. And then I felt like a big ol&#8217; racist.</p>
<p><strong>Google:</strong> Pfft.</p>
<p><strong>Me:</strong> Did you just &#8220;pfft&#8221; me?</p>
<p><strong>Google:</strong> No.</p>
<p><strong>Me.</strong> I&#8217;m not going to get my money, am I?</p>
<p><strong>Google:</strong> No. But we&#8217;re billing you for this call. Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>The Phantom Manifesto</title><category term="Politics"/><id>http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/17/the-phantom-manifesto.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mxrk.net/home/2010/2/17/the-phantom-manifesto.html"/><author><name>Mxrk</name></author><published>2010-02-18T00:02:48Z</published><updated>2010-02-18T00:02:48Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;<span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://mxrk.net/storage/mountvernon.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1266461254340" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Can I just say that I love this new <a href="http://www.themountvernonstatement.com/">Mount Vernon Statement</a>&nbsp;that&#8217;s supposed to reunify the splintering Conservative movement?&nbsp;As a piece of literature it is the vaguest, most intentionally deceptive thing I&#8217;ve ever read. Let&#8217;s take a look, shall we?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We recommit ourselves to the ideas of the American Founding.&nbsp; </span>Through the Constitution, the Founders created an enduring framework of limited government based on the rule of law. They sought to secure national independence, provide for economic opportunity, establish true religious liberty and maintain a flourishing society of republican self-government.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>So far so good. Not so sure how they want me to interpret that &#8220;true religious liberty&#8221; part, but I suppose it has something to do with mandatory Christian prayer in schools and work camps for Muslims. Just a guess.</span></p>
<p>After a completely meaningless second paragraph (trust me), we get to the beefy center:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Each one of these founding ideas is presently under sustained attack. In recent decades, America&rsquo;s principles have been undermined and redefined in our culture, our universities and our politics. The selfevident truths of 1776 have been supplanted by the notion that no such truths exist. The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Even Wolf Blitzer, God bless him, was roused from his insulin coma by the thunderous sound of bovine defecation. Under attack by whom, he wanted to know. Whose notion is it that &#8220;no such truths exist?&#8221; Why the special attention to &#8220;universities&#8221; between culture and politics? Who ever said the Constitution was obsolete and irrelevant? Wolf wanted <em>names</em>.</span></p>
<p>But to ask such questions is to miss the point (sorry, Wolfy). The answer is always the same: homosexuals, communists, immigrants, blacks, and women. The usual suspects. &#8220;Universities&#8221; is a good catch all, but a little later they try to zero in on a particular villain:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Some insist that America must change, cast off the old and put on the new. But where would this lead &mdash; forward or backward, up or down? Isn&rsquo;t this idea of change an empty promise or even a dangerous deception?</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Shhh, quiet&#8230; did you hear them call the President a Muslim? I did. </span></p>
<p>And now the big finish:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p>A Constitutional conservatism unites all conservatives through the natural fusion provided by American principles. It reminds economic conservatives that morality is essential to limited government, social conservatives that unlimited government is a threat to moral self-government, and national security conservatives that energetic but responsible government is the key to America&rsquo;s safety and leadership role in the world.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>You see, the real purpose of this document is not to &#8220;recommit&#8221; moderates, it&#8217;s to beg the Tea Party to stop fucking everything up for the <em>real</em> GOP. People like Grover Norquist get a little nervous when they hear people starting to have their own ideas about how bad God hates poor people. That&#8217;s Grover&#8217;s thing, and the Tea Party needs to start taking orders and stop acting like a third party. Everyone remembers how Ross Perot won the White House for Bill Clinton. And at least he was <em>rich</em>. These Tea Party wannabes are just poor white trash. They&#8217;re good when you need someone <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._assassination">shot from a distance</a>, but independent thought is not their strong suit.</span></p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the problem with the Mount Vernon Statement. It&#8217;s meant to get Conservatives all on the same page again, philosophically, but it assumes the Tea Baggers can read. Just because they bought &#8220;Going Rogue&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean they knew what all those squiggly black lines were for. Let&#8217;s be honest, the average Sarah Palin fanatic thinks breathing through your nose is for faggots.</p>
<p>Getting back to the original intent of the Founders is always going to sound peachy to white men who own property. The ability to be nostalgic for a time when women couldn&#8217;t vote and black people could be owned as property is a particular kind of privilege. It&#8217;s whistling Dixie. Don&#8217;t count on the Tea Partiers following along though. They saw a butterfly out the window ten minutes ago and they are long gone.</span></p>
]]></content></entry></feed>